So he has left a dance competition because he was popular with the voters, and thought he just might win. I think he could have been right too. The voting must have been quite high for Mr S, when you consider he was at the bottom of the judges leader table yet was saved by the public vote, it meant he must have received a considerable percentage of the votes cast; what a popular chappie.
I cant imagine how John Sargent came to his decision, because I for one cant decide if he made the right decision or not. Seems to me that he was damned if he stayed and damned if he went. If he stayed and better dancers were voted out then the public may not have supported him for too much longer, who knows. As he has now left, the argument is that he has let down the voters who supported him and unsportingly bailed out halfway through the program.
Cor what a dilemma !
All some other "celebrities" have to decide is whether to eat the unmentionable parts of an obscure Australian marsupial whilst sitting in the middle of a TV floodlit jungle. Makes decision making for us mere mortals a bit of a doddle doesn't it. I ain't 'arf glad I'm not famous.
Well at least it will push up the ratings, Oh how cynical..................
1 comment:
Hello - i think you are spot on with 'dammed if he did and dammed if he didn't ' but it is afterall a competition that the public can participate in and if the judges/BBC don't like that then they should take away the public vote! For what its worth i thought JS was brilliant !
Post a Comment